Up Olympic Cauldron New Word Order New World Order 7 Principalites of Satan
Thanksgiving Search Sermons Sermons in Word Jesus Christ Grow 101 About Us American History We Believe Aspertame Contact Us Why KJV Fasting Free Church Music Power Point Location Preachers Pledge Of Allegiance Hatfield and McCoy Jehovahs Witness Koran VRS Bible Masons Mormans Believe Catholic Witchcraft in the church Olympics Search Church Prophecy Declaration of Ind Christmas Bible Quiz Men's Minstry Wedding Wheres Your Daddy Powers of Ten MOTHER'S DAY STUFF Rick's Magic Just Another Story Baby Cradle Dr Phil's Test Evangecube Alcoholic Beverages Fundraiser Prayer Bus Ministry Drama Work Shop Feedback Form
|
The
Olympic Cauldron
- Stainless steel gas burning
structure
- 3D static, dynamic &
buckling analysis
- Calculation of structural
displacements for critical service connections
Tierney
& Partners, one of the leading
Australian Civil & Structural Engineering Consultancies are
responsible for the structural design of the Olympic Cauldron, mast and
transport components seen at the opening ceremony of the Sydney 2000
Olympic Games. LUSAS Civil & Structural analysis was used
to assist with the development of this prestigious project.
The 8.5 tonne cauldron is a perforated,
corrugated shell structure fabricated from stainless steel. It has
an overall diameter of 10m and tapers from 0.85m thick at center down to
0.15m thick at the edge. During the opening ceremony it is raised from
its submerged resting place beneath ground level and travels up an
inclined cradle lift to a point from where it is then lifted up to a
final position on a mast 50m above the ground. The cauldron was modeled
in LUSAS Civil & Structural using 3D shell elements and 3D
static, dynamic and buckling analysis was carried out to investigate
self weight, wind, and dynamic effects caused during the transporting
the cauldron to its final resting place.
The complex structure required an
accurate stiffness assessment to be made. This was critical as the
mechanical components needed to compensate for deflections at various
stages of transport. LUSAS showed how the cauldron structure would
perform under various transient loading and supporting conditions, and
highlighted a number of elements with relatively high local stresses. If
some elements or connections were to fail it was possible to foresee the
re-arrangement of the load path and overall behavior. This further
increased confidence in the LUSAS model and hence the structure as a
whole.

The LUSAS results confirmed preliminary
assumptions that the stiffness of the shell, although corrugated, plays
a major role in the strength and stiffness of the cauldron structure.
Relying on the contribution of the corrugated and perforated shell,
discretely connected to the internal frame, enabled this frame to be
extremely light. Apart from an obvious cost effect, this proved to be
critical as the project was nearing its completion and the weight of
equipment was gradually increased from an initial 5 tonnes to a final
8.5 tonnes.
Results obtained were in the expected
range. In fact, first results showed deflections slightly below initial
estimates. However, this "benefit" was soon lost as more and
more gas, electrical and mechanical equipment was added, increasing the
original weight of cauldron by over 60% at the end of project. Due to
presence of the shell the cauldron structure was able to absorb this
increase in load without adversely affecting its performance.
Furthermore, some connections, and in particular those critical ones
near the cradle support for the cantilevering condition, had to be
significantly modified to accommodate operational requirements
(attaching and detaching gas lines and engaging/disengaging mechanical
parts). Time did not allow re-modeling of the cauldron to test it
against proposed changes. However, as a thorough understanding of the behavior
of the cauldron components had already been gained, it sufficed to alter
some properties of the relevant components of the model, which enabled
quick and practical modifications to be approved within hours of the
request for change.
As Zlatko Gashi, engineer on the
project says: 'when reliable and accurate understanding of the behavior
of the structure is required, it can only be achieved by taking into
account all relevant structural components. Neglecting some components
could grossly underestimate the strength and stiffness of the structure.
Complex, sophisticated structures require a modeling and analysis tool
such as LUSAS which can handle all the aspects of structural design,
without burdening the designer with a further complexity of tool itself.
In addition, careful planning before the modeling, and envisaging
potential future modifications and critical issues, is a key to
successful design, and ensures that all benefits can be obtained from
the model throughout the design and construction stage of the
project."
CLICK TO ENLARGE

Client stated benefits in using
LUSAS on this project :
- Having such a sophisticated tool was
essential. It would not be possible to model such a structure with
less sophisticated tool.
- Easy, intuitive modeler.
- Plenty of element types which work
together seamlessly.
- Easy staged modeling, with
refinement of model as design progressed.
- Separate geometry layer and
structure (attributes) layer. Once geometry is created, it is easy
to experiment with various structural attributes.
- Ability to vary support conditions
through load cases (no need to have separate models).
If you would like to
become Born Again, turn to our Salvation
Page now.
We hope you have been
blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so
that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist --
in their daily news.
|

|
Cool Links:
|
|